Introduction

Compiled by Guangdong Fortune Stone New Material Co., Ltd.

[Introduction Guide]

I. The Background and Positioning of Flexible Stone Engineering

Urban renewal is shifting from “large-scale demolition and reconstruction” to “stock renewal, systematic governance, and light intervention.” In this process, the renewal of existing building exterior walls is one of the most common and most complex engineering problems: complex substrate conditions, construction disturbance constraints, tight schedules, strict fire compliance, and difficult cost control. Traditional exterior wall materials each have their applicable boundaries, and a single material can hardly cover all the needs of facade retrofit exterior walls. Flexible stone, commonly known in the industry as flexible facing material, is characterized by lightness, flexibility, thin-set application, A2 flame retardancy, environmental friendliness, fast construction, and strong weather resistance, providing a technical option for facade retrofit exterior wall facing renewal.

But material options do not equal engineering methods. The value of flexible stone in facade retrofit is not realized by proving “performance meets standards” in the laboratory, but through system integration of substrate, bonding, waterproofing, leveling, nodes, construction, acceptance, and operations and maintenance. This book is titled “Flexible Stone Engineering” to express a systematic effort: to advance flexible stone exterior wall engineering from “material experience” and “construction mnemonics” to an engineering knowledge system that is “analyzable, verifiable, replicable, and trainable.”

It should be specially noted that the term “engineering” has a strict meaning in academic contexts—it usually refers to an independent disciplinary branch with clear research objects, basic assumptions, methodology, knowledge system, and disciplinary boundaries. As a new type of flexible facing material, flexible stone has a short engineering application history, long-term durability data are still being accumulated, and the standard system is still being improved. Therefore, the “Flexible Stone Engineering” referred to in this book is not an independent engineering disciplinary branch in the strict disciplinary classification sense, but an engineering knowledge system that takes flexible stone exterior wall systems as its object and covers the entire chain of material—system—construction—acceptance—operations and maintenance. The purpose of this chapter is to clarify the research objects, basic assumptions, boundaries, and limitations of this knowledge system, establishing a common “boundary agreement” for readers’ subsequent study of each chapter.

II. The Research Objects and Basic Assumptions of Flexible Stone Engineering

(I) Research Objects

The research object of Flexible Stone Engineering is: the engineering behavior of exterior wall facing systems composed of modified inorganic powder composite building facing sheets (flexible stone) as the facing layer, together with substrate, bonding layer, waterproofing layer, leveling layer, node sealing, and finished product protection, in the scenario of urban existing building renewal (facade retrofit in Chinese practice).

Specifically, it includes five levels:

1. Material level: the composition, microstructure, formulation system, performance indicators, and testing methods of flexible stone panels.
2. System level: the matching relationships and system performance between flexible stone and substrate, bonding agents, waterproofing layers, leveling layers, and node sealing.
3. Construction level: standardized processes and quality control for substrate treatment, bonding agent application, application technology, node treatment, and finished product protection.
4. Acceptance and operations and maintenance level: acceptance indicators, testing methods, delivery management, common problems, and maintenance guidelines.
5. Engineering decision-making level: applicability boundary determination, life cycle cost, compliance paths, stakeholder coordination, digital material selection, and operations and maintenance.

(II) Basic Assumptions

The analysis and conclusions of this book are built on the following basic assumptions. Readers should first test whether these assumptions hold when applying the methods of this book to specific projects.

Assumption One: Substrate conditions are testable and treatable. The performance of the flexible stone system is premised on the testability of indicators such as substrate strength, flatness, moisture content, and hollowing rate. Scenarios where substrate conditions do not meet requirements and are untreated do not fall within the recommended application scope of this book.

Assumption Two: Material performance is based on test reports. The flexible stone performance indicators cited in this book are based on current standards (JG/T 311, JC/T 2219, GB 8624, etc.) and third-party test reports. Typical values in the book are engineering reference values; specific projects should be based on actual test reports.

Assumption Three: System performance is greater than material performance. The engineering performance of the flexible stone facing layer depends on the system integration of “material + bonding + substrate + nodes + construction + maintenance,” not on a single material indicator. This book takes system thinking as its basic methodology.

Assumption Four: Construction quality can be standardized, trained, and accepted. This book assumes that flexible stone construction processes can be trained and quality-controlled through standardized processes such as “one scrape, two apply, three press, four level.” Construction teams can meet acceptance standards after technical briefings and sample training.

Assumption Five: Engineering decisions are subject to multiple constraints. Facade retrofit exterior wall material selection is constrained not only by technical performance but also by policy compliance, cost budgets, schedule disturbance, stakeholder gaming, and other multiple constraints. This book takes “technical—economic—compliance—organizational” multi-dimensional analysis as its decision-making framework.

Assumption Six: Long-term durability data are still being accumulated. Flexible stone long-term durability data have not yet undergone complete building life cycle verification. Data involving service life, weather resistance, and life cycle cost in this book are estimates based on existing tests and engineering tracking; readers should verify them in conjunction with actual projects.

The above six assumptions are the “preconditions” of this book’s methodology. If the assumptions hold, the methods are applicable; if the assumptions do not hold, special argumentation should be conducted. This is an important hallmark distinguishing engineering textbooks from product manuals: first clarify the premises, then discuss the methods.

III. The Knowledge System and Chapter Structure of Flexible Stone Engineering

The knowledge system of this book consists of five parts and thirty-three chapters, corresponding to the five knowledge modules of Flexible Stone Engineering:

The relationship among the five modules is: Shi determines direction, Dao determines foundation, Shu determines methods, Qi determines tools, and Ju determines strategy. Readers can choose reading paths according to their roles: material R&D personnel focus on “Dao,” construction management personnel focus on “Shu,” facade retrofit offices and owners focus on “Shi” and “Shu,” and enterprise managers focus on “Ju.” When used as a textbook, it is recommended to read through in the order of “Shi—Dao—Shu—Qi—Ju”; when used as a reference book, relevant chapters can be directly searched according to problems.

IV. The Disciplinary Boundaries of Flexible Stone Engineering and Its Relationship with Adjacent Disciplines

The research scope of Flexible Stone Engineering:

1. Studying flexible stone exterior wall engineering behavior with a systems approach;
2. Cross-application of materials science, civil engineering, engineering management, and engineering economics in flexible stone exterior wall scenarios;
3. A trainable, acceptable, and replicable engineering method system;
4. A practice-oriented knowledge system based on current standards, test reports, and engineering cases.

(III) Relationship with Adjacent Disciplines

This book’s citation of theories from adjacent disciplines follows the principle of “borrowing analytical tools, not crossing boundaries to replace”: theories are used to explain engineering problems, not to replace professional design documents of each discipline. This is the measure readers should grasp when learning the “theoretical perspectives” of each chapter.

V. The Theoretical Perspectives and Research Methods of Flexible Stone Engineering

This book introduces analytical frameworks such as composite material theory, signaling theory, stakeholder theory, technology acceptance model, and life cycle cost theory. As a textbook, four explanations need to be made regarding the use of theoretical perspectives:

1. Theory is an analytical tool: the theoretical perspective of each chapter aims to provide an analytical framework for engineering problems; readers should focus on its “explanatory power” rather than the “number of theories.”
2. Theories have applicable conditions and boundaries: each chapter marks the applicable conditions and limitations of theories; readers should judge in conjunction with actual projects.
3. Theory cannot replace standards and argumentation: theoretical analysis conclusions do not replace current standards, design documents, test reports, and special argumentation.
4. Some theories originate from Western academic contexts: when applied in Chinese facade retrofit scenarios, they need to be adjusted in conjunction with China’s policy environment, industry practices, and organizational structures.

In terms of research methods, this book adopts literature research, case studies, experimental and test data citation, survey research, comparative research, and scenario analysis. Readers should focus on mastering the analytical chain of “problem—theory—method—verification,” rather than memorizing theoretical terms.

VI. Legal Status Statement on Data, Cases, and Patents

Data statement: The performance data, cost data, and carbon footprint data cited in this book come from public standards, third-party test reports, enterprise experimental data, industry reports, and engineering tracking estimates. Where values are estimates, the book marks “reference value, subject to actual project conditions.” Long-term durability data are still being accumulated; readers should verify them in conjunction with actual projects.

Case statement: The cases in this book are all desensitized, retaining technical data, treatment schemes, and acceptance conclusions, without involving specific owner names, project addresses, or commercial secrets. Case conclusions are based on engineering tracking; readers can conduct third-party verification through technical parameters, but cannot directly contact the original projects for confirmation.

Patent statement: The enterprise patent application information involved in the book is based on public announcements by the China National Intellectual Property Administration. The related patent applications are in the substantive examination stage and have not yet been authorized; this does not constitute an authorization commitment, nor should it replace technical argumentation for specific projects. The description of related technologies in this book is based on public patent application documents and engineering practice, without involving enterprise core formula secrets.

Standard statement: The standard numbers and names cited in this book are based on the current valid versions at the time of publication. The standard system continues to be updated; readers should refer to the current valid standards, design documents, and special argumentation in the project location.

VII. Academic Co-Construction and Textbook Development Statement

After the first draft of this book was completed, the author team, based on the first draft, carried out academic co-construction with university teams, focusing on: theoretical framework review, terminology system review, joint verification of key performance, case library review, and academic outputs (white papers, papers, standard drafts, case databases, etc.). The participating units, review experts, and revision notes of academic co-construction will be listed in the preface or appendix when the book is published. Academic co-construction does not constitute certification or endorsement of any product performance.

VIII. Learning Method Suggestions

1. Test assumptions first: before applying the methods of this book to specific projects, first test whether the “basic assumptions” in Section II of this Introduction hold.
2. Diagnose first, prescribe later: facade retrofit projects should first conduct old wall inspection and on-site investigation (Chapter 14), then select system solutions (Chapter 15).
3. Comply first, economize later: material selection should first meet policy compliance and fire protection requirements (Chapters 3 and 8), then calculate life cycle cost (Chapter 12).
4. System first, material later: flexible stone is a facing layer option within a system; it does not replace substrate treatment, waterproofing, leveling, structural reinforcement, and fire protection construction (Chapter 15).
5. Use within boundaries, argue outside boundaries: flexible stone has clear applicable boundaries (Chapter 11); within boundaries, follow the methods of this book; outside boundaries, conduct special argumentation.
6. Current standards prevail: this book does not replace current standards, design documents, test reports, and special argumentation. Specific projects should be based on the current valid standards, design documents, and competent authority requirements in the project location.

IX. Conclusion

The establishment of Flexible Stone Engineering relies on the gradual formation of standard improvement, data accumulation, engineering verification, academic co-construction, and industry consensus. What this book does is to organize knowledge scattered in material manuals, construction experience, test reports, policy documents, and engineering cases into an analyzable, verifiable, trainable, and replicable framework.

Diagnose first, prescribe later; system first, material later; comply first, economize later; safety first, aesthetics later—these four sentences are both the methodology of this book and the boundary principles of Flexible Stone Engineering, and the basic engineering outlook that readers should establish when studying this course.

References

[1] European Commission. A Renovation Wave for Europe[R]. COM(2020) 662 final, Brussels, 2020.

[2] European Parliament and Council. Directive (EU) 2024/1275 on the energy performance of buildings[S]. Official Journal of the European Union, 2024.

[3] UK Parliament. Building Safety Act 2022[S]. UK Public General Acts 2022 c.30, London, 2022.

[4] New York City Department of Buildings. Facade Inspection & Safety Program (FISP)[S]. NYC Administrative Code § 28-301.1, New York, 2020.

[5] European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)[S]. Official Journal of the European Union, 2006.

[6] U.S. Green Building Council. LEED v4.1 for Building Design and Construction[S]. Washington, DC: USGBC, 2019.

[7] Ministère de la Transition Écologique (France). MaPrimeRénov: Aides à la rénovation énergétique[EB/OL]. Paris, 2021.

[8] Governo Italiano. Decreto Rilancio (DL n. 34/2020): Superbonus 110%[S]. Gazzetta Ufficiale, Roma, 2020.

[9] General Office of the State Council. Guiding Opinions on Comprehensively Promoting the Renovation of Old Urban Residential Areas[Z]. Guobanfa (2020) No. 23, 2020.

[10] State Council. Notice on Issuing the “15th Five-Year Plan for Urban Renewal”[Z]. Guofa [2026] No. 12, 2026-05-28.

[11] General Office of the CPC Central Committee, General Office of the State Council. Opinions on Continuously Promoting Urban Renewal Actions[Z]. 2025-05-15.

[12] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. China Urban Construction Statistical Yearbook 2023[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2024.

[13] State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of China. Greenhouse Gases—Carbon Footprint of Products—Quantification Methods and Requirements[S]. GB/T 24067-2024. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2024.

[14] KfW Bankengruppe. KfW Klimaschutz und Sanierungsreport 2023[R]. Frankfurt am Main, 2024.